Legal analysis warns of discrepancies between INDH reform bill and international standards
Law and human rights experts published a critical analysis of Message No. 174-374 presented by the Chilean government to reform the National Institute of Human Rights (INDH). The report argues that the legislative initiative departs from the UN Paris Principles by altering the tenure of board members and removing the power to file lawsuits in serious crimes.
The examined article details that the government bill immediately terminates the terms of the eleven current sitting board members and implements a transitional board appointed via a list proposed by the President of the Republic.
Likewise, the authors note that the proposal eliminates the INDH's authority to file lawsuits for serious crimes such as torture, forced disappearance, and crimes against humanity, limiting its role primarily to advisory functions and generic reporting.
Finally, the analysis contrasts these provisions with recent resolution 63/25 adopted by the United Nations in October 2026, which emphasizes the importance of financial and administrative independence and the stability of national human rights institutions.
- The Chilean government introduced Message No. 174-374 to reform the structure and powers of the INDH.
- The bill contemplates ending the terms of the 11 current board members and modifying the appointment system.
- It is proposed to eliminate the INDH's authority to file criminal lawsuits in cases of serious crimes.
- The United Nations recently approved resolution 63/25 urging the strengthening of the independence of these institutions.
Corroborates: Legal analysis warns of discrepancies between INDH reform bill and international standards